smokingboot: (raven)
smokingboot ([personal profile] smokingboot) wrote2006-03-19 11:21 am

V for Very Pertinent

Saw V for Vendetta last night; read the comic years ago.

Tell a story a different way and it becomes a different story, because the tale's not in what happens but in the telling...and in the time of the telling. Purists who go to see panels of the original made mobile on screen will be disappointed, but I wasn't. It's different but yes, it works. A little self conscious in places, and you don't feel the grubby cruelty of Fate's Britain, but still, harsh enough. I would watch it again.

It's a good time for a film like this to be out, especially for Brits, cos some say we have a tendency to believe nothing will ever go wrong, it couldn't happen round here. The laws will always be reasonable and our rights will never be infringed, not really; The Lords, the Queen, the England Football Manager, The BBC, God, God's mate with a sense of humour, someone somewhere will always sort it out. Commonsense will always win in the end.

But of course, rights do not spring out of a sense of natural justice. The only rights we really have are those we are prepared to defend.

What follows is on so many people's ljs, I apologise to anyone reading this who is sick of the subject, but some things bear repeating.

The Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill has recently passed its second reading and is now in Committee.
The implications are far reaching and potentially very dangerous. Here is the bill. Be warned, it is tedious reading, but very important. Black and white with many loud noises = interesting; the fights we lose are the grey quiet ones.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmbills/111/06111.1-4.html

Should you wish to act upon what you read, here is a link by which you can contact your mp: http://www.writetothem.com/

I am indebted to [personal profile] binidj for pointing at this issue, and linking to an lj which analyses it in depth: http://oldmotherchaos.livejournal.com/65547.html.

[identity profile] november-girl.livejournal.com 2006-03-19 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Having looked at the Bill and at the hubbub surrounding it, I honestly think everyone's overreacting. s4(2) limits it to things that are dealt with at ministerial level anyway - the only difference is that rather than Pariament having to ask the minister to make the rules, the minister will make the rules first, and Parliament will object if necessary.

[identity profile] smokingboot.livejournal.com 2006-03-19 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
But it seems to have potential for real abuse, and we cannot always assume best, or even most informed, intentions on the part of individual ministers. What is wrong with parliament asking the minister to make the reform as is done now? The hardest mistake to correct is the one it's too late to change...

[identity profile] squeezypaws.livejournal.com 2006-03-19 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I saw the film too on Saturday night, and am so glad you've posted this.

[identity profile] smokingboot.livejournal.com 2006-03-20 09:15 am (UTC)(link)
Folk like [personal profile] binidj and [profile] oldmotherchaos have done all the hard work, I've just repeated stuff...but I was struck by the synchronicity.

I enjoyed V immensely, but suspect it will never be the most popular film to come out of Hollywood!