Listen to this and tell me where it goes wrong:
'Welcome to Hoover Candy Service department, to whom am I speaking?'
'I'm [insert first and surmane]'
'And may I call you Miss, Ms or Mrs [surname]?'
[reply with prefix of preference or say, 'Just call me boot']
Tough and complicated isn't it? So much better to have the following:
'What name is the appliance under?'
I give my beloved's surname cos he bought it.
'Ok Mrs [beloved's surname]'
'No, we're not married, we live together. My surname is [insert own surname]'
'OK Mrs [own surname]'
'No. Stop. We live together, we are not married. I am a Ms. This is the 21st century. How hard can it be?'
Q much confusion. She clearly cannot see why I am refusing the ultimate accolade available to all femininity everywhere; the compliment that some glorious penis wielder might look down upon this poor hapless maiden and offer to share his name with me, our eternal ultimate aspiration. Gosh, how grateful I should be.
It's that old assumption that every woman must want to be married. Now I have a very loving partner, and if ever man could put up with me as an appalling wife, he could; but my experience of other people's marriages, from parents to friends, has not filled me with sanguine expectation; I love weddings, it's the matrimony bit, with its historical background of ownership, that isn't for me. Love freely given and freely taken suits me better.
I understand that all have their own preference, and I respect that preference. Just don't assume it's mine.
Of course, everyone has a different take on this, hence my suggestion for an opening intro on the phone for professional matters. But this is too much trouble; after all, we all want it secretly, don't we? Unless we're lesbians of course, or one of those poor divorced ladies who still have appliances bought in their marital names. Oh well, maybe it will make them recall those magic days when they belonged, or make them try harder next time.
So just call me Mrs Him, or Her Indoors or The Missus, and I'll get that warm glow that comes from being owned and therefore cherished, right? I mean we all know the real test of whether I have worth is not about what I do or who I am, but if I can get a man to invest in me long term, with engagement ring as non-refundable deposit, right?
Or we could bypass any possible irritation one way or another, and just ask.
Engineer's supposed to be coming tomorrow. Let's see what happens when they call.
'Welcome to Hoover Candy Service department, to whom am I speaking?'
'I'm [insert first and surmane]'
'And may I call you Miss, Ms or Mrs [surname]?'
[reply with prefix of preference or say, 'Just call me boot']
Tough and complicated isn't it? So much better to have the following:
'What name is the appliance under?'
I give my beloved's surname cos he bought it.
'Ok Mrs [beloved's surname]'
'No, we're not married, we live together. My surname is [insert own surname]'
'OK Mrs [own surname]'
'No. Stop. We live together, we are not married. I am a Ms. This is the 21st century. How hard can it be?'
Q much confusion. She clearly cannot see why I am refusing the ultimate accolade available to all femininity everywhere; the compliment that some glorious penis wielder might look down upon this poor hapless maiden and offer to share his name with me, our eternal ultimate aspiration. Gosh, how grateful I should be.
It's that old assumption that every woman must want to be married. Now I have a very loving partner, and if ever man could put up with me as an appalling wife, he could; but my experience of other people's marriages, from parents to friends, has not filled me with sanguine expectation; I love weddings, it's the matrimony bit, with its historical background of ownership, that isn't for me. Love freely given and freely taken suits me better.
I understand that all have their own preference, and I respect that preference. Just don't assume it's mine.
Of course, everyone has a different take on this, hence my suggestion for an opening intro on the phone for professional matters. But this is too much trouble; after all, we all want it secretly, don't we? Unless we're lesbians of course, or one of those poor divorced ladies who still have appliances bought in their marital names. Oh well, maybe it will make them recall those magic days when they belonged, or make them try harder next time.
So just call me Mrs Him, or Her Indoors or The Missus, and I'll get that warm glow that comes from being owned and therefore cherished, right? I mean we all know the real test of whether I have worth is not about what I do or who I am, but if I can get a man to invest in me long term, with engagement ring as non-refundable deposit, right?
Or we could bypass any possible irritation one way or another, and just ask.
Engineer's supposed to be coming tomorrow. Let's see what happens when they call.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 04:27 pm (UTC)Don't say to me "But you're married, you have to be Mrs". Grr
no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 04:29 pm (UTC)Are you back from Iceland?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 04:36 pm (UTC)Should have gone:
"Hello how may I help you."
[describe issue]
"May I have the details of your guarantee/service agreement?"
Finished
Ms is an issue though..... especially in other countrys. Which is where most call centres are now.
A lot of non native speakers are taught that Miss and Mrs are the two forms of polite address.
Its not really helped even in the UK that a lot of girls/women will be offended if you call them 'Ms' as well.
In addition on the phone and in person (especially where its not your first language many people will hear 'Ms' as 'Miss' since its fairly unpronounceable.
Better to level the tables and refer to men as Master or Mr dependent on status marital.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 04:38 pm (UTC)Really?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 05:23 pm (UTC)Surely the way to level things is to have neutral prefixes for both sexes?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 06:46 pm (UTC)When Mrs as an abbreviation of Mistress was applied to all grown women (admittedly a couple of centuries ago now) it was OK.
I don't necessarily want to be identified by insect noises, but if the only alternative is to define myself by the extent to which I am bound over to an xy, linking myself to a tradition which I hope will bring joy to those who trust in it, but which I have almost always found more ruinous to the lives of women than any other single instance, I'll live with the sound and keep my partnership status my own affair *no pun intended!*
My god, I seem to have turned into Elizabeth I!
*applauds*
Date: 2007-01-22 07:06 pm (UTC)That usually flummoxes them enough that they forget what they were trying to sell me.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 08:19 pm (UTC)What did used to drive me wild was when S moved into my house with me. The house was in my name. Cold callers used to ring up, hear me answer and ask for 'Mr Roberts' - who is, of course, my dad as S's name is Smith. Gnrgh.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 08:57 pm (UTC)However much we let people know-they still call her by name though (often including my Christian name as well to rub it in). Society is incredible dumb and slow sometimes.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-22 11:09 pm (UTC)The argument runs like this - you cannot call someone a person as the word 'son' implies a male (equally perdaughter is right out) therfore we say perdata as data is a nice gender neutral term. This was used in some English Labour council areas eg perdatahole (manhole being sexist), chairperdata, etc
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 09:17 am (UTC)I think the offence thing is probably left over from the first introduction of Ms. Lots of people didn't want to be associated with the movement that started it and saw it as just a judgmental a word. Using Ms. caused people to make an assumption about your personal feelings and politiocs. Some women assume that people using it are in some way embarressed by being married. Less true now but its still a hang over, especially with the older generation.
I dunno, in france, madame/madamoiselle is a polite respect thing as well as a marital indicator you'll often be corrected but are expected to say 'madame' unless you've been told otherwise.
Master fell out of use for men so MR is used even though it's technically an indicator of status.
I think changiong common usage is very difficult, still in another ten years I imagine Ms will be the norm as the older generation become less influential.
At the end of the day the negative connotation of Ms/Mrs is placed on it by women (these days) I think... I don't know many men who really care if your married or not.... if all women started using Mrs instead (much like Mr) then it may have been easier to effect a quicker change by changing an extant word. Obviously a bit late for that now though....
Gosh aint semantics difficult.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 09:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 10:26 am (UTC)News Shopper would not use Ms. As a sub editor there it used to drive me mad and lead to many difficult conversation with people being interviewed for features - trying to explain that although they may call themselves Ms the newspaper would only use Miss or Mrs, so which would they prefer? And, no, we did not use the first name followed by the last name after the first useage. So if they would not choose Miss or Mrs we would choose for them.
It annoyed me particularly as, although I am married, I am not Mrs Davies, I am Ms Szachnowski as I did not sign the forms to legally change my name and have no desire to do so.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 10:41 am (UTC)There's a lot of old rubbish to sweep away.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 10:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 10:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 10:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-23 10:51 am (UTC)