smokingboot (
smokingboot) wrote2016-11-03 04:07 pm
Law Jaw
The high court has, unsurprisingly, come down on the side of the challengers regarding the government's attempt to use the Royal Prerogative to prevent MPs in the Houses of Parliament voting on Brexit.
It did not bode well to have one of the judges point out the obvious.( 'I'm baffled,' Lord Thomas said. 'These rights are under treaty. If amending the treaty, parliamentary approval is needed. So, I don't understand why the content of these rights are not controlled by parliament?' http://uk.businessinsider.com/supreme-court-article-50-court-case-day-3-lord-chief-justice-was-baffled-by-the-uk-governments-key-arguments-2016-10)
I may wade through the entire judgement at some point. https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/judgments/r-miller-v-secretary-of-state-for-exiting-the-european-union/ But the bit that sings to me so far is here: https://twitter.com/StevePeers/status/794124143369355265
Now of course we have a backlash against the judges from those who fervently fight for parliamentary sovereignty until it doesn't agree with them.
This is actually a good time to be ill. Viewing all this through a fever almost makes sense of it.
It did not bode well to have one of the judges point out the obvious.( 'I'm baffled,' Lord Thomas said. 'These rights are under treaty. If amending the treaty, parliamentary approval is needed. So, I don't understand why the content of these rights are not controlled by parliament?' http://uk.businessinsider.com/supreme-court-article-50-court-case-day-3-lord-chief-justice-was-baffled-by-the-uk-governments-key-arguments-2016-10)
I may wade through the entire judgement at some point. https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/judgments/r-miller-v-secretary-of-state-for-exiting-the-european-union/ But the bit that sings to me so far is here: https://twitter.com/StevePeers/status/794124143369355265
Now of course we have a backlash against the judges from those who fervently fight for parliamentary sovereignty until it doesn't agree with them.
This is actually a good time to be ill. Viewing all this through a fever almost makes sense of it.
no subject
no subject
Farage is braying for it, which indicates he sees more power to UKip from such a development. So do I, unfortunately. At least one party somewhere must stand on the mandate of staying in the EU,and if that means Tories and Labourites hiving off, then so be it. Then the people have a proper legal vote, with a proper manifesto and all is done and dusted. And if the bad times are coming, at least we can prepare.
This rubbish has turned up in Liverpool Street Station : http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/posters-for-new-police-antiterror-initiative-on-trains-spark-racism-row-a3385836.html
This is the front page of the Mail: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwXyo91WEAA7NUq.jpg
Here is what was on the web page. I think they have removed it nowhttps://queerty-prodweb.s3.amazonaws.com/content/docs/2016/11/03140854/Screen-Shot-2016-11-03-at-11.08.34-AM-670x448.jpg
I do not know how close to real trouble we are. These are grotesque things to see and read, as we approach Remembrance Day.
no subject
no subject
But I do not see what the alternative is, tbh. After the nonsense regarding the royal prerogative and the Lord Chancellor, it is pretty clear that the actual mechanics of parliamentary democracy don't matter to May. Her refusal to condemn the attacks on the High Court judges, especially from the press, suggests that Kitten Heels is running scared of the far right. I thought this after hearing the regrettable rhetoric of the Tory Party Conference. They are pandering, for all May's tough attitude.
no subject
Could be...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Track three here http://www.opera-rara.com/vert-vert.html
It is much funnier than it sounds, painting a picture of the extremely spoilt deceased pet eating and boozing itself to death somewhat happily.
no subject
Cheered up something of a gloomy time for me, thank you! :-)
no subject
http://amzn.eu/cd54cKc
http://amzn.eu/et59emE
Thank you!