
One's from Nazi Germany, laughing at desperate Jewish people kicked out of their homeland and trying to find other countries to take them in. The other is from yesterday's Daily Mail. The Daily Mail's historical support of fascism is well known.
“My dear Price, [G.Ward Price, Chief Correspondent] I am glad you have become a director of the Daily Mail, and I am sure that your very popular and widely circulated newspaper will continue to be a sincere friend of fascist Italy. With best wishes and greetings, Mussolini" Benito Mussolini, 1926
"I urge all British young men and women to study closely the progress of the Nazi regime in Germany. They must not be misled by the misrepresentations of its opponents. The most spiteful detractors of the Nazis are to be found in precisely the same sections of the British public and press as are most vehement in their praises of the Soviet regime in Russia. They have started a clamorous campaign of denunciation against what they call “Nazi atrocities” which, as anyone who visits Germany quickly discovers for himself, consists merely of a few isolated acts of violence such as are inevitable among a nation half as big again as ours, but which have been generalized, multiplied and exaggerated to give the impression that Nazi rule is a bloodthirsty tyranny.” - Harold Harmsworth, 1st Viscount Rothermere, 1933
The Telegraph talks about Rothermere's more personal support for Hitler here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1484647/When-Rothermere-urged-Hitler-to-invade-Romania.html
Rothermere's descendant and current owner of the Daily Mail, Jonathan Harmsworth, is domiciled in Monaco in order to avoid paying tax in Great Britain. Here is a piece from Private Eye on where he really lives:
( Read more... )
What kind of a world is it when a fascist supporting organisation, owned by those who love their country so much they'll do anything to avoid contributing to it, can't even use ideas from its nazi mates to deride enemies? If James Cagney can call someone a 'dirty rat,' what's so bad about using rats to describe people we hate? After all, I am sure Harmsworth wouldn't mind me calling him a rat, he is too minted and too powerful to care. But I never would call him a rat because rats are clever sensitive sweet creatures, and they are an aspiration too far for him or indeed, his readers.
I don't think this vile nonsense will lead anywhere; I think we will find peace because this kind of stuff is truly ridiculous and we know it. There's real goodness in the hearts of ordinary people. But if we do surrender to Rothermere Rot through fear or anger or historical ignorance of what it means to let this stuff seep into one's self and country, we deserve what we get.