Happy Birthday to...
Mar. 6th, 2006 12:35 amWishing each of you a fantastic year!
(btw, Chomper99, do you remember that exhibition you told me about, 'The rooks of Trelawney' or something? If you can give me some clue as to where I can find out more, I would be very grateful)
Re: Rooks of Trelawny
Date: 2006-03-07 04:44 pm (UTC)it's not so much the actual exhibition I am thinking about so much as a story of the Rooks Chomper mentioned... something about a woman under psychiatric examination who is advised to photograph the rooks...but the pyschiatrist also has issues in need of attention...
Or I may have got this whole story completely wrong.
Re: Rooks of Trelawny
Date: 2006-03-07 04:57 pm (UTC)The exhinbition is as surreal as the story. It is pretending to be about photography, but it isn't really it is more about the story of the rooks of Trelawny. And it is like a maze with narrow passages and little displays were you press a button and a kind of Monty Python-esque animation is supposed to happen but most of them aren't working.
Fantastic!
Date: 2006-03-07 05:11 pm (UTC)Thank you *does happy dance!*
I wonder, do you know of any books on the subject? Suppose I could telephone the museum and see if they know...
Re: Fantastic!
Date: 2006-03-07 05:13 pm (UTC)Re: Fantastic!
Date: 2006-03-07 05:22 pm (UTC)If I find it, I will let you know!
I'm excited now; I knew that story was totally mental, I just couldn't recall the details!
Re: Fantastic!
Date: 2006-03-07 07:14 pm (UTC)Additional snippets that I recall:- the psychiatrist's patient was advised to take up anthropology as a form of therapy, but as lucyas points out it didn't seem to go very well. Adding to the odd effect of the content was that the individual parts of the exhibit were numbered sequentially only if you jumped about. You had to go from one side of a corridor round the corner and then back again to follow it. But the most bizarre part was the final display which was just an entire wall painted black with the legend: "6pm. The rooks have not returned."
We asked other people passing through the exhibition what they thought it was about and they muttered vaguely about it being about photography, missing the whole therapy/anthropomorphism/madness angles. The normalcy of Polo mints preserved out sanity at the time.
We asked the little old ladies at the admissions table if we could speak to the curator and they told us he'd be back in an hour. When we returned an hour later the museum had been closed for 40 minutes and was shut for the rest of the day.
Quality strangeness.
Re: Fantastic!
Date: 2006-03-07 10:35 pm (UTC)I must try to contact the museum to see about the exhibition, which, 8 years on, I expect to have vanished in all its Pythonesque glory. We have Andrew Lanyon's book; I would love to trace the sources behind his story.